Welcome to GBAN!

November 15, 2010 Press Release

The power of social media is undeniably revolutionary, dynamic, and essential for grassroots organizations. Decades of work from around the world to educate, advocate, and ultimately ban asbestos has culminated in the creation of a new social media based community effort called the Global Ban Asbestos Network (GBAN).

GBAN is a non-profit and independent initiative established to promote and facilitate collaboration, communication, and action to achieve a global asbestos ban.  GBAN is being launched two months earlier based news and need, and will continue to add additional Charter Members representing their country and content to our website.  Our connected social media resources will pioneer innovative methods to improve the efficacy of grassroots efforts to combat the global asbestos threat. The Facebook page was the first part of the network and has hundreds of followers already within just a few weeks.

GBAN is proud to introduce the first 24 Charter Members representing 17 countries who have joined in solidarity and support. Initial charter members will be joined by other leading ban asbestos individuals from across the globe as GBAN rapidly expands. Each Charter Member can regularly contribute content to the site, providing an additional one-stop resource representing the world’s preeminent asbestos authorities. Technology allows the GBAN website portal to translate postings into nearly 60 different languages. In addition, visitors will be able to utilize a variety of social media programs including Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Picasa Photos to post comments, pictures, videos, etc. while easily sharing information with the click of a mouse.

We have nearly 300 GBAN Facebook supporters who have ‘liked’ the ‘page’ and had more than 4,000 visits with a soft launch.

It’s exciting to look at how all of our global efforts are now coming together through this kind of extensively linked social media network. GBAN is a strong and powerful reminder that the voices of ban asbestos advocates are truly united.

GBAN was founded by the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO) and the Brazilian Association of the Asbestos-Exposed (ABREA).

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

BAN ASBESTOS FRANCE PRESS RELEASE: Asbestos: a scandal once again!

Asbestos: a scandal once again! 

Denial of justice announced by the way of press articles 

Press release, 15 May, 2013

 According the journal « le Canard enchaîné », the investigation chamber of the Appeal Court of Paris should take a shocking decision, on the next 17May, 2013, reversing the indictment of civil servants and other members of the Asbestos Permanent Committee, in the criminal asbestos trial in France.

Failure of secrecy is a serious disruption of the impartiality of judges in making a decision. But the most serious is the decision itself.  The Court would have not identify any “link” between the deaths of tens of thousands of victims, for most workers, and the activity of the Asbestos Permanent Committee in which the Ministry of Labour was represented ex officio.  However, this activity has been to prevent regulations on asbestos in France and Europe, from the early 1980s to the emergence of the social movement of asbestos victims and the ban in 1996.

Who will anyone believe that “senior officials have no regulatory power”? The state is not powerless when it has to protect the wealth of powerful people. Would it be without any capacity of   action concerning the health and lives of workers, whose work has made the fortune of asbestos producers?

This decision, if confirmed, arouses indignation and revolt of asbestos victims and all those who fight at their side. It strengthens their determination to continue the struggle for justice. With their lawyers, Ban Asbestos France and the association Henri Pézerat will continue the action for the recognition by the criminal courts, of the reality of the asbestos disaster and its consequences as an industrial crime.

Sent by Annie THEBAUD MONY, France

Posted in Blog | Comments Off

“Toolkit for the Elimination of Asbestos-Related Diseases” Was Released

We are pleased to hereby deliver the “Toolkit for the Elimination of Asbestos-Related Diseases.” The toolkit was developed to serve as a concise and easy-to-use source of knowledge, technologies and information related to eliminating asbestos-related diseases (ARDs). The traditional public health approach of addressing the three levels of prevention was considered a basic means for tackling ARDs. It is a sad reality that many countries, especially rapidly developing countries, continue to use asbestos at alarming levels. The developing countries in Asia are at the forefront of this trend, so we intend for the administrators, practitioners and researchers of Asian countries to be the primary beneficiaries. However, we hope that any concerned party will benefit from this toolkit. Whoever the party, a core principle to bear in mind, while referencing this toolkit is that “the most efficient way to eliminate ARDs is to stop the use of all types of asbestos.”

A total of 190 factsheets (380 pages) are included in this toolkit, along with 200 pages of originally developed reference documents and a CD which contains all the materials. The following website provides a comparable version:

http://envepi.med.uoeh-u.ac.jp/toolkit/index.html

The chapters are descriptively entitled:

  1. Asbestos Exposure Assessment, Risk Identification, and Substitutes
  2. Asbestos-Related Legislations and Regulations
  3. Diagnostic Tools for ARDs
  4. Economic Cost/Burden Incurred by Asbestos Exposure and  ARDs
  5. Risk Communication


The toolkit’s contributors include 25 authors and editors originating from eight countries and regions, all of whom pitched in with their effort and time to achieve a common goal. Several world-class experts supported our efforts as advisors, and the RCS-UNEP, WHO and ILO oversaw the entire process.

Secretariat of the Toolkit:

Mehrnoosh Movahed, MD, PhD

Ying Jiang, PhD

Ken Takahashi, MD, PhD, MPH (Principal Investigator)

Department of Environmental Epidemiology, IIES

University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan

Dr. Ken Takahashi is a GBAN Charter Member

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

UN Cancer Agency asked to sever its ties to asbestos propagandists

UN Cancer Agency asked to sever its ties to asbestos propagandists

Kathleen RuffDr Christopher Wild

Director, International Agency for Research on Cancer

World Health Organization

March 27, 2013

Dear Dr. Wild,

Re: Our grave concerns regarding IARC’s collaboration (Uralasbest research project on chrysotile asbestos) with an Institute and scientists who have demonstrated unethical and improper conduct by misrepresenting their scientific findings in an earlier Uralasbest research project on chrysotile asbestos.

We call on you to terminate IARC’s collaboration with the Scientific Research Institute of Occupational Health of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RAMS) and with Dr. Evgeny Kovalevskiy because of unethical and improper scientific conduct on their part – conduct which is incompatible with the standards expected of IARC or any reputable scientific agency.

1) In 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) terminated the status of RAMS as a WHO Collaborating Centre. The WHO was disturbed by the close relationship between RAMS and the Russian asbestos industry. The director of RAMS, Dr. N. Izmerov, was, in fact, the first president of the Russian Chrysotile Institute, the industry’s lobby group, and is a longtime advocate for the asbestos industry.

2) Dr. Kovalevskiy and other scientists at RAMS continue to promote the interests of the Russian asbestos industry instead of pursuing impartial science. They have lobbied the European Union and the Supreme Court of Brazil not to ban chrysotile asbestos. In so doing, Dr. Kovalevskiy and the other RAMS scientists deny the overwhelming independent, reputable, scientific evidence, including that of IARC, regarding the hazards to health posed by chrysotile asbestos.

It constitutes scientific misconduct that, in their presentations to the European Commission(1), to the Brazil Supreme Court(2), in scientific papers(3) and to the public(4), Dr. Kovalevskiy and the other scientists at RAMS deliberately misrepresent the findings of the 1995 joint Finnish-Russian-American research project(5) on asbestos miners and millers at Uralasbest, Russia, the world’s biggest producer of chrysotile asbestos.

Dr. Kovalevskiy and other scientists at RAMS falsely and repeatedly state that the Uralasbest research project proved that chrysotile asbestos no longer causes harm to the health of Russian asbestos workers, and that the research project provided evidence that supports their position that chrysotile asbestos should continue to be used.

These statements are a gross misrepresentation of the scientific findings of this project; they are totally false. The Uralasbest research project provided no such evidence. The study did not include cancer incidence and provided no evidence whatsoever regarding cancer risks from exposure to chrysotile asbestos.

It should furthermore be noted that the mean number of years since first exposure to chrysotile asbestos for the workers included in the Uralasbest study was 25 years, which is an insufficient latency period to allow any reliable risk estimates to be made of the long-latent asbestos-related diseases.

It is a gross deception on the part of Dr. Kovalevskiy to claim that this study provided evidence that only workers exposed to huge levels of chrysotile asbestos in the distant past had been harmed, and that no harm had been caused to the health of workers since those times.

A signer to this letter, Dr. Richard A. Lemen, was the principal representative of the United States and one of the originators of the Joint US/Finnish/Russian study. He confirms that the findings of this earlier Uralasbest study, and of the papers published as a result of this study, provide no scientific evidence that supports the argument that chrysotile asbestos can be safely used.

To use data, collected in the name of the Uralasbest Joint research project, as supposedly constituting evidence that supports continued use of chrysotile asbestos is a misrepresentation of the data and constitutes either incompetence or unethical conduct on the part of Dr. Kovalevskiy and the other RAMS scientists.

In light of these facts, it is indefensible that IARC has installed Dr. Kovalevskiy as its lead scientist on a new Uralasbest research project on chrysotile asbestos.

3) Just as Dr. Kovalevskiy and the RAMS scientists misused the earlier Uralasbest research project as ammunition in their lobbying efforts to promote continued use of asbestos, the Russian government is already using IARC’s collaboration in the new Uralasbest research project to crush initiatives to ban asbestos in developing countries(6).

The Russian asbestos industry newsletter reports(7) that, during trade negotiations with Thailand, Russia succeeded in persuading the government of Thailand to delay its proposed ban on the use and import of asbestos. In announcing this decision, the head of the Russian trade delegation, Igor Manylov, specifically noted, as information to justify the deferment of the ban, that “Russia has initiated a study with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the impact of asbestos and asbestos containing materials on human health.” (translation)

This represents a perversion of scientific research. IARC should not allow its name and reputation to be used by the government of Russia to defeat initiatives by health professionals in developing countries to ban asbestos.

4) The RAMS Research Institute of Occupational Health, of which Dr. Kovalevskiy is director, co-sponsored the international conference Chrysotile asbestos: assessment and risk management, held in Kiev, Ukraine in November 2012. The conference was proposed by Russia and the Ukraine at the 5th Rotterdam Convention Conference of the Parties (COP5) in 2011 as a means of defeating the recommendation of the Convention’s expert scientific body (the Chemical Review Committee) to list chrysotile asbestos as a hazardous substance, which Russia and the Ukraine opposed.

At the Kiev conference, a draft resolution was presented. It called for a refusal to list chrysotile asbestos as a hazardous substance at the upcoming May 2013 6th Conference of the Parties. The draft resolution stated that the Kiev conference “was held in accordance with recommendations of the V Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention (19-25 June 2011, Geneva).” The draft resolution was approved by the Kiev conference.

The draft resolution put forward totally false information. In no way whatsoever did the 2011 Conference (COP5) endorse the recommendation put forward by Russia and the Ukraine. In fact, it was specifically opposed as an effort to undermine the recommendation of the Chemical Review Committee(8).

At COP5, the WHO expressed disappointment that a decision to list chrysotile asbestos had not been taken “given that the criteria for listing have been met”.

It is indefensible that IARC is collaborating with the RAMS Research Institute of Occupational Health – an institute that has demonstrated a history of misconduct in serving the interests of the asbestos industry and currently is seeking to undermine the UN Rotterdam Convention.

We ask you, as Director of IARC, to discontinue collaboration with scientists and organizations known to misrepresent research data for the promotion of commercial interests.

We have copied this letter to Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organization. If you refuse to address these grave concerns of improper and unethical conduct on the part of IARC, then we ask that Director-General Chan call for your resignation and initiate a review of how IARC permitted this profoundly respected agency of the WHO to be infiltrated by a scientist, such as Dr. Kovalevskiy, who distorts scientific findings to advance the interests of the asbestos industry.

Sincerely,

DR RICHARD A. LEMEN, Ph.D., MSPH, Assistant Surgeon General (ret.), Rear Admiral, USPHS (ret.); Adjunct Professor, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

DR ARTHUR L. FRANK, MD, PhD, Professor of Public Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA

DR BARRY CASTLEMAN, ScD, Environmental Consultant, USA; author, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, USA

DR COLIN L. SOSKOLNE, Professor of Epidemiology, Dept of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Visiting Fellow, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Australia; Immediate Past-President, Canadian Society for Epidemiology and Biostatistics

KATHLEEN RUFF, author, Exporting Harm; Senior Human Rights Adviser, Rideau Institute; Co-coordinator, Rotterdam Convention Alliance (ROCA)

Copy:

Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization

Giuseppe Ruocco, Aide to Renato Balduzzi, Minister of Health, Italy

THE FOLLOWING SCIENTISTS SUPPORT THE ABOVE LETTER:

DR. NICHOLAS A. ASHFORD, PhD., JD, Professor of Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA; Former Chair, US National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health

PROF. NURSEN BASARAN, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Ankara, Turkey

DR. MICHELINE BEAUDRY, Ph.D., professeure retraitée, l’Université Laval, Québec, Canada

DR. FIORELLA BELPOGGI, Director, Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Centre, Ramazzini Institute, Italy

DR. JAMES BROPHY, PhD, University of Windsor; former Executive Director, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada

PROFESSOR SURASAK BURANATREVEDH, MD, DrPH, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Thailand

DR. CHALERMCHAI CHAIKITTIPORN, PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Thailand

DR SANJAY CHATURVEDI, MD, FAMS, FIPHA, FIAPSM, Professor & Head, Dept. of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, India

DR. ING. PAIBOON CHOUNGTHONG, King Mongkut’s University of Technology, Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand

ANDRÉ CICOLELLA, Scientific adviser, INERIS, National Institute for Environment and Risks, France

DR. AQIEL DALVIE, Associate Professor; Programme Leader, Chemical Toxicity and Exposures, University of Cape Town, South Africa

EVA DELGADO ROSAS, Licencie en Sociologie, Secretaria Tecnica, Consejo Nacional de Salud Ocupacional, Presidenta, Asociacion Frente al Asbesto, Perú

DR. LUIZ AUGUSTO FACCHINI, Medical Epidemiologist, Professor, Department of Social Medicine, Counselor, ABRASCO (Brazilian Association on Collective Health), Brazil

DR. CATHEY EISNER FALVO, MD, MPH, President, International Society of Doctors for the Environment; Professor and Chair, International Public Health, New York Medical College (retired); Professor of Pediatrics, NYMC (retired), USA

DR. HELENO R. CORRÊA FILHO, Dr.PH, MD, Epidemiologist, Associate Professor, UNICAMP, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Brazil

DR. ERICA FRANK, MD, MPH, Professor and Canada Research Chair, School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada

DR. JAIRO ERNESTO LUNA GARCÍA, PhD, Professor, National University of Colombia

DR. LUIS CUAUHTÉMOC HARO GARCÍA, PhD, Academia de Salud Comunitaria, Promoción a la Salud, Universidad de la Ciudad de México, Mexico

DR THOMAS H GASSERT, MD, MSc, Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Visiting Scientist in Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Harvard University School of Public Health, USA

FERNANDA GIANNASI, Civil Engineer, Labor Inspector, Brazilian Federal Ministry of Labor and Employment; Founder, ABREA, the Brazilian Association of People Exposed to Asbestos, Brazil

DR PIERRE GOSSELIN, MD, MPH, Director, WHO-PAHO Collaborating Center on Occupational and Environmental Health, CHUQ-INSPQ-DSP, Québec, Canada

DR. JOSEPH GRAZIANO, PhD, Professor of Environmental Health Sciences and Professor of Pharmacology, Columbia University – Mailman School of Public Health; Director, The Columbia University Superfund Research Program, New York, USA

DR MORRIS GREENBERG, MB, FRCP, FFOM, former, HM Medical Inspector of Factories, UK

DR JAMES HUFF, PhD., Guest Researcher, Chemical Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Research, Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

DR. PETER F. INFANTE, D.D.S., Dr.P.H., F.A.C.E., Peter F. Infante Consulting, LLC; Formerly Director, Office of Standards Review, Health Standards Program, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), Washington, D.C., USA

DR MOHAMED F JEEBHAY, MBChB, PhD, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa

DR. T K JOSHI, Director, OEM Programme, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, New Delhi; Fellow, Collegium Ramazzini, Italy; Visiting Professor, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, USA

DR. MARGARET KEITH, PhD, University of Windsor; former Research Coordinator, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, ON, Canada

DR. DAVID G. KERN, M.D., M.O.H, Consultant in Occupational and Environmental Medicine; Formerly, Associate Professor of Medicine, Brown University, USA

DR. PATTAPONG KESSOMBOON, MD, PhD., Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

DR JOHN R. KEYSERLINGK, MD., MSc., FRCS(C)., FACS, Director, Medicine & Surgical Oncology, Ville Marie Oncology Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

DR. RICHARD KLASA, MDCM, FRCPC, Lymphoma and Melanoma Tumor Groups, Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and Department of Experimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer Research Centre;Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada

DR. NIKLAS KRAUSE, MD, MPH, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Environmental Health Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health; Director, Southern California NIOSH Education and Research Center, University of California Los Angeles, USA

DR. VITHAYA KULSOMBOON, PH.D., Associate Professor and Director of Social Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

PROFESSOR LESLIE LONDON, Director: School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, South Africa

DR. GUADALUPE AGUILAR MADRID, PhD, Unidad de Investigación en Salud en el Trabajo, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI.IMSS, Mexico

DR. DAVID C.F. MUIR, PhD, FRCP, Professor Emeritus, MacMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Dr. PETER ORRIS, MD, MPH, FACOEM, FACP, Professor and Chief of Service, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, USA

DAVID OZONOFF, MD, MPH, Professor of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA

DR. DOMYUNG PAEK, MD, MSc, ScD, Dean, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

DR. DANIELA PELCLOVA, MD, Ph.D., Professor of Occupational Medicine, Fellow, Collegium Ramazzini; Head, Department of Occupational Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

DR. CUAUHTEMOC A. JUAREZ PEREZ, MSc, MD, Unidad de Investigación en Salud en el Trabajo, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI.IMSS, Mexico

DR PITCHAYA PHAKTHONGSUK, MD, PhD, Occupational Health Unit, Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Thailand

DR. WANTANEE PHANPRASIT, PhD, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Thailand

DR. FRIEDRICH POTT, MD, Professor of Hygiene 1980, Emeritus member, Collegium Ramazzini, E.W.Baader-Preis for Occupational Medicine, Germany

PROF. QAMAR RAHMAN, Ph.D, D.Sc (hc), FNASc, FST, Visiting Professor, Rostock University, Germany; Dean of Research (Science and Technology), Amity University, Lucknow India

DR. SUTHEE RATTANAMONGKOLGUL,PhD, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University,Thailand

DR. KNUT RINGEN, DrPH, MHA, MPH, Senior Science Advisor, CPWR: The Center for Construction Research and Training; Vice President, ISSA Section for Prevention in the Construction Industry; Secretary and Immediate Past President, Scientific Committee on Occupational Health in the Construction Industry; Past Chair, US National Advisory Committee on Safety and Health in the Construction Industry, USA

DR. BEATE RITZ, MD, PhD, Chair, Department of Epidemiology, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, USA

DR. ALLAN H. SMITH, MD, PhD, Professor of Epidemiology and Director, Arsenic Health, Effects Research Program, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA

DOTT. MORANDO SOFFRITTI, Direttore Scientifico, Istituto Ramazzini e Segretario Generale, Collegium Ramazzini, Italy

DR. JERRY SPIEGEL, MA, MSc, PhD, Professor, School of Population and Public Health; Director, Global Health Research Program, Liu Institute for Global Issues, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

DR.TIM K. TAKARO, MD, MPH, MS., Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada

DR. ANNIE THÉBAUD-MONY, PhD, Directeur de recherche honoraire à l’Inserm, Université Paris 13; Présidente de l’Association Henri Pézerat (Santé Travail Environnement); Porte parole de Ban Asbestos France

DR. FERNAND TURCOTTE, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Professor Emeritus of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

DR. CATHY VAKIL, MD, CCFP, FCFP, Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

DR. RODOLFO ANDRADE DE GOUVEIA VILELA, PhD, Professor, School of Public Health, Environmental Health Department, São Paulo University, Brazil

DR. JUNG-DER WANG, MD, ScD, Chair, Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan

DR. RICHARD P. WEDEEN, MD, Professor of Medicine and Professor of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, The New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

DR. HANS-JOACHIM WOITOWITZ, MD, Univ.-Prof. Emeritus; Former Director, Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Giessen, Germany

DR. ROBERT D. WINSTON, MD, FRCPC, FACP, Clinical Assistant Professor, UBC Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Abbotsford, Canada

DR. ANNALEE YASSI, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Professor and Canada Research Chair, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Notes: Titles and affiliations are given for identification purposes only. Some of the signers have been involved in asbestos litigation.

[1] Judgment On The Problem Of Total Ban Of Asbestos By The Russian Group Of Governmental Experts, Russian Chrysotile Institute, 2002 http://chrysotile.ru/en/site/index/antiasbestovaja_kampanija/mnenie_rossijskih_uchenyh

[2] Testimony, Brazil Supreme Court, August 31, 2012, Evgeny Kovalevsky, Director, Research Institute of Occupational Health of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

[3] Chrysotile Russian Experience in Occupational Health, Abstract, N. F. Izmerov, State Run Organization Research Institute of Occupational Health of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 2006, http://www.chrysotile.com/en/conferences/speakers/Nikolai_Izmerov.aspx

[4] The only solution to the problem:the controlled use of asbestos, Yevgeny Kovalevsky, Russia, Live Journal, July 29, 2010, Russian Chrysotile Institute, http://ru-chrysotile.livejournal.com/6363.html

[5] Comparison of Work History and Chest X-ray Changes among Chrysotile Miners and Millers.Kovalevsky et al, AOH (2002)

[6] Russia crushes a plan by the government of Thailand to ban asbestos, Kathleen Ruff, March 1, 2013, RightOnCanada, http://www.rightoncanada.ca/?p=1926

[7] Chrysotile is on trial in Thailand, Chrysotile Today, Russian Chrysotile Institute, August 2012 http://chrysotile.ru/ru/files/get_file/46/2d232e7779641fe817b38b4e4f36c0f9

[8] Earth Negotiations Bulletin, International Institute for Sustainable Development,Vol. 15, No. 187, http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb15187e.pdf : “An international scientific conference on chrysotile asbestos to examine all scientific data prior to CRC8 (8th meeting of the Chemical Review Committee) was proposed. This was opposed by several parties, who noted that the CRC’s recommendation is final.”

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Exposé of the International Chrysotile Association

Exposé of the International Chrysotile Association

The International Chrysotile Association Continues Its Deadly Work Around The World by Kathleen Ruff, RightOnCanada.ca

Right now, a battle is being waged in Europe to hold the asbestos industry accountable for its criminal negligence in hiding the risks of asbestos, thus causing thousands of deaths.

In Italy, last year, in the historic Eternit trial, a court sentenced top asbestos executives – Swiss millionaire, Stephan Schmidheiny, and Belgian Louis de Cartier de Marchienne – to 16 years in prison for the human and environmental catastrophes they caused. Schmidheiny and Marchienne are spending millions of dollars on lawyers and public relations initiatives in an attempt to avoid prison.

In France, the National Association for the Defense of Asbestos Victims (ANDEVA) is seeking to have criminal charges laid against asbestos industry executives, scientists and government officials for negligence in covering up asbestos risks, which resulted in the deaths of thousands in France.

Yet still today, the asbestos industry continues to practice the same deadly deception and the same criminal negligence. If not stopped, this will cause a repeat, in Asia and elsewhere, of the same tragedy that has cost so many lives in Europe.

The International Chrysotile Association: its history

The International Chrysotile Association is a lobby group for the global asbestos industry. Its purpose is to promote the use of asbestos, particularly in Asia, Latin America and Africa.

It was originally called the Asbestos International Association (AIA) and was set up the UK in 1976. Two decades later, when the UK and Europe were moving towards banning asbestos, the AIA needed to find a more hospitable environment. What could be better than Canada – a major asbestos exporter with the priceless asset of allowing Canada’s international credibility and the Canadian flag to be used as fronts for asbestos propaganda?

In 1997, the AIA moved to Montreal in Quebec and set up a cosy relationship with the Canadian lobby organisation, the Asbestos Institute. The president of the Asbestos Institute, Clément Godbout, was also the Chairman of the AIA. Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources, Ralph Goodale, boasted: “The location of this head office underlines Canada’s international leadership and expertise in dealing with chrysotile asbestos issues.”

In order to have a better image, the AIA and the Asbestos Institute removed the word “Asbestos” from their names in 2005, re-registering themselves in the Quebec corporate registry as the International Chrysotile Association and the Chrysotile Institute.

In 2012, the Chrysotile Institute closed its doors. In the face of severe criticism for giving taxpayer money to this disreputable asbestos lobby organisation, the Canadian government ceased its funding in 2011; as the two last Quebec asbestos mines were bankrupt and unable to contribute their portion of the Institute’s finances, the closure of the Chrysotile Institute became inevitable.

The Chrysotile Institute’s demise left the ICA without a home. I wish I could report that it too closed down. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

The International Chrysotile Association re-creates itself

On July 1, 2011, Jean-Marc Leblond was appointed as the new President and Chairman of the ICA to replace Clément Godbout.

Leblond was Vice-President in charge of sales of LAB Chrysotile Inc. at Thetford mines for 21 years. He then became President of Chrysotile Canada Inc., a company that marketed asbestos overseas on behalf of LAB Chrysotile Inc. and Jeffrey Mine Inc. In June 2011, he set up his own international commerce consulting company, Polyser Inc.

At the same time, the ICA opened an office in Thetford Mines at the same address as Polyser Inc.

Five New Directors Appointed

Leblond has appointed new directors to the board of the ICA. On October 4, 2011, four new directors from Mexico, Colombia, Sri Lanka and United Arab Emirates were appointed and on January 1, 2012, a director from India:

1] Antonio Galvan Carriles, President of the Instituto mexicano de fibroindustrias (Mexican Institute of Fibre Industries), the Mexican asbestos lobby organisation

2] Jorge H. Estrada, Calle 71, No 10-47, Interior 7, Bogota, BC, Colombia

3] Jey Gnanam, 175 Sri Sumanatissa, Mawatha, Colombo, Sri Lanka

4] Mounib Hatab, CP PO Box 1371 Dubai, U.A.E.

5] M. L. Gupta, 90, Nehru Place New Delhi 110019, India. Gupta is Chairman of Everest Industries Ltd., which is a member of the Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers’ Association of India.

Eight Other Directors Of The ICA

Another eight directors continue to sit on the board of the ICA. They are from Indonesia, Brazil, the US, Kazakhstan, Russia, China, India and Mexico:

1] Bob J. Pigg, CP PO Box 2227 Arlington, VA 22202-9227 USA, president of the Asbestos Information Association, North America and a long-time lobbyist for the asbestos industry

2] Tubagus N. Farich, Gedung Alia 7FL JL MI Ridwan Rais No 10 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia

3] Rubens Rela Filho, Cana Brava Mine P.O. Box 01 76450-000 Minaçu Brazil

4] Kanat Kopbayev, 040907 Almaty Region Karasay District Alatau State Farm Samal Street 8-A, Kazakhstan

5] Yury Kozlov, 66 Uralskaya Str., Sverdlovsk Region, Russia

6] Zhang Zhan, Rm 426, Nanpeilou Bldg No 11, Sanlihelu, Beijing. China

7] A. Shankar, Sanatnagar, Hyderabad 500018, India

8] Petraca Francisco, 133 Piso 9 Co. Chapultecpec Polanco, Mexico, DF CP 11560, Mexico

The terms of the following ten ICA directors expired in 2011:

1] Clément Godbout, 1640-1200 av. McGill College, Montréal (Québec) H3B4G7 Canada (Note: This was the address of the Chrysotile Institute, now closed down.)

2] Fouad Makhzoumi, Abu Dhabi Dubai, U.A.E.

3] Rudy Rivera Duran, Avenida Blanco Galindo Km 7.5 Casilla Cochabamba 1791 Bolivia

4] Hugo Villegas Gomez, Carera 17 No. 93-82 Officina 502 Santa Fe De Bogota, Colombia

5] Luis Cejudo Alva, Estado De Mexico 52959 Atizapan, Mexico

6] Tu Le Dinh, No. 6 Vu Gnoc Phan Str 3 Floor Ha Noi City Vietnam

7] M. Ganesan, 175 Sri Sumanatissa Mawatha Colombo Sri Lanka

8] M. Khamvardi, 68819-Doroud P.O. Box 311, Lorestan, Iran

9] Richard Lardez, 16 AVE Lamine Guéye X Rue Monteil CP BP 320 CP18524 Dakar, Senegal

10] Sanjaya Kanoria, A-94 Malhotra House, Green Park Main, New Delhi 110 016, India (Note: Mr. Kanoria was appointed a director on October 4, 2011 and ended his term on December 31, 2011.)

The International Chrysotile Association continues its work promoting deadly misinformation and harm around the world

The ICA has sponsored conferences and meetings that bring together scientists and lobbyists financed by the asbestos industry. These conferences disseminate deadly misinformation about asbestos and promote its use.

In 2011, a powerful public relations company with a history of working for the tobacco industry, APCO Worldwide,, intervened in Malaysia to try to defeat a ban on asbestos, proposed by the Malaysian Department of Occupational Safety & Health. APCO refused to disclose who had hired them to carry out this work. It was discovered, however, that it was, in fact, the ICA who had hired APCO. See Put human lives ahead of asbestos profits, public health advocates tell APCO Worldwide.

APCO brought in David Bernstein, a scientist allied to and funded by the asbestos industry, to speak at meetings in Malaysia, organised by APCO, where he put forward the asbestos industry’s propaganda that chrysotile asbestos can be safely used

Barry Castleman, a world expert on the asbestos issue, stated at the time: “It is scandalous that these international influence peddlers representing foreign asbestos companies are blocking public health decisions in Malaysia.” Dr Fernand Turcotte, Professor Emeritus of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, called on APCO “to stop pushing the deadly propaganda of the asbestos industry. The world has seen enough asbestos deaths.”

The International Chrysotile Association and the upcoming Rotterdam Convention Conference

The ICA and scientists it finances, like Bernstein, continue, however, to peddle the industry’s deadly deception and to undermine initiatives to protect people from being harmed by asbestos.

In May 2013, the Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention will take place in Geneva. Once again, the recommendation of the Convention’s expert scientific committee to list chrysotile asbestos as a hazardous substance will be put forward.

The ICA has financed a piece of research by David Bernstein and other industry funded scientists, Health risk of chrysotile revisited, published in February 2013, which claims that the studies they examined provide “a framework for establishing safe use” of chrysotile asbestos and that low exposures do not present a detectable risk to health.

It is likely that asbestos industry lobbyists, who always attend the Rotterdam Convention conferences, will use this ICA-funded article to try to, once again, block the listing of chrysotile asbestos as a hazardous substance.

No transparency

The ICA refuses to provide information about its activities and its finances. No annual reports or financial statements are made public.

The last two asbestos mining companies in Canada, both in Quebec (LAB Chrysotile Inc. and Jeffrey Mine Inc.) are bankrupt and both mines are shut down. Thus the funds to finance the ICA office in Quebec and to fund the ICA’s activities, such as hiring APCO and commissioning pro-chrysotile research, are, it seems, coming from asbestos interests outside Canada.

Quebec’s reputation continues, however, to serve as a public relations asset for the ICA, along with the ICA’s slogan, claiming that it is an association “For environmental, occupational health, safe and responsible use.”

Time for an end to immunity

The ICA continues in 2013 to practice the same deadly deception for which the two Eternit asbestos executives have been sentenced to prison in Italy and the same deadly deception for which asbestos executives and their political and scientific collaborators are being pursued in France.

It is time for the immunity – enjoyed by the asbestos industry and its lobby groups for so many decades – to end.

Kathleen Ruff, Global Asbestos Awareness Network (GBAN) Charter Member

Posted in Blog | Comments Off

Eternit Appeal Trial: Statement from the Turin Courts, February the 14th, 2013 from Italy, France, and Belgium

Posted on February 14, 2013 

Eternit TrialExactly a year ago to the day , the Turin Courts of first instance sentenced the Swiss defendant Stephan Schmidheiny and the Belgian Louis de Cartier de Marchienne to 16 years jail, the defendants being the owners of  the Eternit company, an asbestos cement multinational.

Today is the first day of the appeal trial, and the asbestos victims have gathered from France and Belgium to express their support to the Italians.

As representatives of Afeva, Andeva and Abeva, the three associations that defend asbestos victims in Italy, France and Belgium, we would like to reiterate our support for the Italian victims as well as making the following statement.

We sincerely hope  the Italian Court of Appeal and the Justice system  will confirm last year’s sentence of the court of first instance, which mirrored  the severity of the human and environmental catastrophes Eternit caused in Casale Monferrato, Rubiera, Cavagnolo  and Naples. We are also asking the Italian Government to help the victims and their families receive  the compensation the Courts awarded them. 

We ask  the French Government to reinstate investigating magistrate, Madame Bertella Geffroy and to supply her with the necessary means to conclude the preliminary inquiries so that the French Justice system can hold the criminal court case the French victims have been waiting for 16 years. Please sign the appeal/petition  at the following link which lists all these requests: http://www.santepublique-instructionendanger.org 

We also ask  the French Justice system to identify and bring to court  those who bear responsibility. The Court of Cassation must speak for the victims: it morally unacceptable and unfathomable that nobody should be held accountable for  a disaster which causes no less than 3,000 victims a year in France alone. It is unacceptable that tragedies such as the Amisol or the Conde-sur-Noireau one  (a large asbestos textile company) should end with the case being dismissed with a non suit and that the people being investigated should be acquitted before being tried. 

In the civil asbestos cases in Belgium, Eternit has appealed the sentence inflicted in November 2011. We ask the Belgian Justice to listen to the voice of the victims and convict the multinational which is responsible. 

‘Afeva, Andeva  and Abeva are appealing to the Government and to the Courts to respect the suffering of the asbestos victims and their families. They do not only want compensation.  They, we,  want justice. They want those who were responsible to be tried, not a vendetta, revenge,  but for future generations to learn from these disasters so that it may never happen again, ever again. 

 Signed by: 

ITALY: Afeva, CGIL, CISL e UIL Casale

BELGIUM: Abeva

FRANCE:  Andeva 

Posted in Blog | Comments Off

Press Release: “Bihar Chief Minister promises to ‘puncture’ construction of asbestos factories”

Press Release  February 14, 2013

Shared by Gopal Krishna, ToxicsWatch Alliance

Bihar Chief Minister promises to ‘puncture’ construction of asbestos factories

Chief Minister’s environment friendly intervention welcomed

Memorandum demands stoppage of asbestos factory and withdrawal of fake cases

Patna/New Delhi February 14, 2013: Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar met the leaders of ban asbestos movement led by Vaishali’s Khet Bachao Jeevan Bachao Jan Sangharsh Committee (KBJBJC) and the leaders of left parties and promised to ‘puncture’ construction of asbestos factories in the State. The Chief Minister met the leaders at his residence at 1, Anne Marg in Patna in the evening hours of on February 13, 2013. The Hindi Press Release of Khet Bachao Jeevan Bachao Jan Sangharsh Committee (KBJBJC) and their Memorandum to the Chief Minister is attached.

This announcement of the Chief Minister follows declaration of Shri Awadhesh Narain Singh, Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council saying ‘buying asbestos is akin to buying cancer’ at a conference on environmental and occupational health on December 24, 2012, in his address to the health experts, scientists, trade union leaders, academicians, civil society leaders and villagers. The conference also adopted a Patna Declaration urging State of Bihar to ban Asbestos Product Use and to ban Asbestos Product Use. Speech of Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council is available athttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9TbemRUkYM The Declaration which has been submitted to the Chief Minister is attached.

Officials present at the meeting suggested a campaign to end the use of asbestos based products in the State.

Bihar Chief Minister expressed outrage at the granting of ‘No Objection Certificate’ by Bihar State Pollution Control Board (BSPCB) to hazardous asbestos based factories in fertile agricultural lands.

In a remarkable move Bihar Chief Minister phoned Chairman, BSPCB and fixed an appointment for the villagers of Vaishali for February 14 and expressed his disapproval for asbestos based factories to him in front of the leaders of the left parties and the villagers’ committee.

Villagers met the Chairman, BSPCB today. The Chairman spoke to District Magistrate, Vaishali and assured the villagers of necessary action for cancelling the approval given to the asbestos company’s plant.

The current status of the asbestos factories in Bihar is as under:

1) Kolkata based UAL Industries Ltd for Establishment of 2, 33, 000 MT per year capacity Asbestos Cement Sheet and Corrugated Sheets Plant in two phases at Goraul, Vaishali in the name of UAL-Bihar. Earlier it was proposed at Bakhtiyarpur. This has been suspended temporarily

2) Chennai based Ramco Industries Ltd for establishment of 1, 20, 000 MT/Annum Capacity of Asbestos Cement Sheet Plant and 2 Lakh MT/Annum Capacity of Cement Grinding Plant at Industrial Area, Bihiya, Bhojpur. In his speech of Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council available above on the youtube, he expressed concern about this plant.

3) Chennai based Nibhi Industries Pvt. Ltd for establishment of the One Lakh MT Capacity Asbestos Fiber Cement Corrugated Sheet, Flat Sheet and Accessories and Light Weight Fly Ash Block Plant at Industrial Growth Centre, Giddha, Ara, Bhojpur. In his speech of Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council available above on the youtube, he expressed concern about this plant. This has been taken on lease by Utkal Asbestos Limited (UAL) in a strategic move realizing that construction of its asbestos based plant will not be allowed by the villagers of Vaishali.

4) Andhra Pradesh based Hyderabad Industries Ltd for establishment of 2, 50, 000 MT per year capacity Asbestos Cement Sheeting Plant in two Phases at Kumarbagh Industrial Area, West Champaran

5) Kolkata based Balmukund Cement & Roofings Ltd for establishment of 1.5 Lakh MT capacity production unit of Asbestos Fiber Cement Sheet (Corrugated/Flat) and Accessories at Chainpur-Bishunpur, Marwan, Muzaffarpur. This has been stopped following bitter struggle of villagers of Marwan block of Muzaffarpur.

6) Rajasthan based A Infrastructure Ltd for establishment of 1, 25, 000 MT per year capacity Asbestos Cement (A.C.) Sheet and 1,00,000 MT per year capacity A.C. Pressure Pipe at Pandaul Industrial Area, Madhubani.

Following Chief Minister’s intervention Bihar’s State Investment Promotion Board (SIPB) and the State Cabinet must disapprove asbestos based industrial projects and rescind earlier approvals.

Struggle of villagers of Vaishali’s Chaksultan Rampur Rajdhari near Panapur in Kanhauli Dhanraj Panchayat in Goraul block against asbestos based factory has reached a decisive phase. Villagers have been protesting against this lung cancer causing hazardous plant under the banner of KBJBJC for more than 2 years.
After the villagers Mahadharna of June 14, 2012, the district administration had put a stay on the construction of the factory. When the construction started again on December 16, 2012, the villagers blocked the Mahua-Samastipur road for 9 hours to express their protest against the proposed white asbestos plant of UAL company in their village on June 14. Cancer causing white asbestos also called chrysotile asbestos is banned in 55 countries.

It is noteworthy that “The Government of India is considering the ban on use of chrysotile asbestos in India to protect the workers and the general population against primary and secondary exposure to Chrysotile form of Asbestos.” This has been revealed in a concept
paper by Union Ministry of Labour revealed during 19-20th September, 2011. The resolutions of WHO and ILO in 2005 and 2006 have called for the elimination of asbestos.

In India, mining of asbestos is technically banned but its import from other countries is yet to be banned. Trade in asbestos (dust & fibers) is also banned.

The shady designs of the UAL company against the villagers and protesters to protect its hazardous plant at the cost of villagers’ health was condemned by the speakers who spoke at the demonstration. In a dubious move, the UAL has filed case no. 252/2012, 509/2012 and
510/2012 to silence the voice of public interest persons. This appears to be done to trap villagers into concocted cases as part of company’s design to malign the movement of the KBJBJC. The memorandum sought the withdrawal of three fake cases lodged in Mahua Thana, Vaihsali.

Asbestos Virodhi Nagrik Manch, Patna and left and socialist parties participated in the demonstration on January 16, 2012 to express solidarity with the villagers struggle against the asbestos based factory of Utkal Asbestos Limited.

Now that the construction of asbestos based factory in Vaishali is all set to be permanently stopped, the issue of three asbestos plants in Bhojpur’s Giddha and Bihiya will come to the forefront where protest has been going on for more than 2 years. Notably, the Giddha plant is situated behind a B Ed College. The villagers are protesting against this plant. In Bihiya, Tamil Nadu based Ramco Industries is operating two asbestos plants amidst protests from villagers. Memorandum has been submitted to the District administration in this regard.

The memorandum to the Chief Minister demanded white asbestos based plants should be closed in public interest keeping public health in mind and dismissal of fake case registered by Utkal Management.

For Details: Gopal Krishna, ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA), Mb: 08002263335 (Patna), 9818089660 (Delhi)

Ajit Kr Singh, Khet Bachao Jeevan Bachao Jan Sangharsh Committee (KBJBJC), Vaishali, Mb: 08002903995, E-mail:ajeetsinghpushkar@gmail.com

Posted in Blog | Comments Off

“European Shipowners dumped 365 Toxic Ships on South Asian Beaches Last Year”

European Shipowners dumped 365 Toxic Ships on South Asian Beaches Last Year”  press release shared by Mohit Gupta, Charter Member of GBAN for India.

On February 5, 2013 the NGO Shipbreaking Platform issued the press release entitled “European Shipowners dumped 365 Toxic Ships on South Asian Beaches Last Year.”  Patrizia Heidegger, Executive Director of the NGO Shipbreaking Platform said, “Despite the possibility of proper disposal in Europe or other developed countries, the vast majority of European shipping companies continue to profit by having their ships broken cheaply and dangerously on the beaches of South Asia. The EU must adopt mechanisms that will prevent European shipowners from exporting toxic ships for breaking in developing countries and instead recycle them according to the health, safety and environmental laws and standards of their own countries.”

The Platform’s 2012 list shows that most of the end-of-life ships sent by European shipowners did not fly an EU flag[3]. In fact, 240 of them used what is commonly referred to as the “flags of convenience” phenomenon, using flags such as Panama, Liberia, the Bahamas or St Kitts-and-Nevis, which makes it more difficult for the EU to prevent their dismantling in substandard facilities. Read the full press release online at http://bit.ly/11JzsFT

Posted in Blog | Comments Off

NewsClick Video Interview of Dr. Barry Castleman: “Dangers associated with asbestos”

Published on Dec 21, 2012

“Dr. Barry Castleman, a well-known International Expert on Asbestos discusses with NewsClick on the dangers associated with asbestos. He says asbestos, a mineral fibre, is hazardous to the health of the people and to the environment. The exposure to air-borne asbestos dust causes asbestosis and lung cancer. In 2006, ILO and WHO have banned the usage of asbestos and over 50 countries have already banned it. In India, unfortunately there is no regulation on the asbestos industry.” ~ NewsClick

Dr. Barry Castleman, is a world renowned scientific expert, ban asbestos activist,  Charter Member, and hero to thousands around the world.  Please view and share this newly published video interview from India.

Linda

Linda Reinstein, GBAN Co-Founder and Charter Member

Posted in Blog | Comments Off

Take ADAO’s “Supportive Resources in the Mesothelioma Community” Survey!

Posted on October 2, 2012

In five minutes, you can share your experiences, knowledge, and recommendations as a mesothelioma patient or caregiver by completing ADAO’s “Supportive Resources in the Mesothelioma Community” Survey.

Technology has greatly changed since Alan was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2003. With your help, we can use the survey results to better understand what has been most helpful to mesothelioma patients and families and what is needed for the future.

In addition to the survey, I will interview some patients and caregivers to deepen our understanding about the needs and benefits of supportive resources.

Please fill out the confidential ADAO survey today, as our deadline is December 31st.

In unity,

Linda

Linda Reinstein, GBAN Co-Founder and Charter Member

Click here to complete the “Supportive Resources in the Mesothelioma Community” Survey!

Posted in Blog | Comments Off

The ANDEVA International Demonstration for Asbestos Victims, Paris by Yvonne Waterman

In the early afternoon of October 13th, I found myself walking determinately through the streets of Paris to the central meeting point of an international asbestos demonstration that would cross the inner city of Paris and end at the impressive Opera building. “There’ll be hundreds and hundreds of people there”, the organisers had informed me. They were wrong: there were thousands of them. Literally. Six thousand, all of them braving the wet and windy weather, queuing up with their banners, boards and photographs of loved lost ones, along the length of several streets, waiting patiently for the signal to begin walking. What a sight! Yvonne Waterman, Sc.D. LL.M., GBAN Charter Member, The Netherlands

Tyler Lemen, Pat Martin, Yvonne Waterman, Linda Reinstein

There was an energetic and determined atmosphere in the air. Many of these people had come a long way – some had even crossed oceans – for a sincere purpose: to count, to be counted and to hold accountable; and they weren’t going to be put off by some silly rain. That was plain for all to see. The international aspect of the global fight against asbestos was also evident: there were some thirty different flag carriers, ranging from France, the United States of America and Belgium to Brazil, Germany, Canada, Italy, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Spain, the Netherlands, South Africa, etc. There were flags I didn’t even recognize. I was astonished by the multitude of French asbestos victims’ organisations. On many banners, demands were made for social justice and criminal prosecution for asbestos crimes. Clearly, the message of the Turin trial had been widely received. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off